    |
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
All About All:Requests for comment/Media, art and literature
<center>Requests for comment on Media, art, and literature</center>
1. List newer entries on top, stating briefly and neutrally what the debate is about.
2. Provide a link to the relevant article's talk page.
3. Sign entries with the date only, by using five tildes: ~~~~~.
4. Do not continue the debate here, or make personal comments on this page.
|
- Talk:British Sea Power - Dispute over inclusion of the name of the band's manager, an external link to an interview, and cited material about the band's interest in birdwatching. Behavior in question includes edit warring, uncivil edit summaries, and an editor's claim to be a member of the band.
- Talk:List of minor Doctor Who villains — an edit war over whether one clause is needlessly speculative and confusing. One user continues to revert, despite a clear consensus from at least four other editors. Dispute has included personal attacks and a general lack of civility. —09:18, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Phish: a band article. Ongoing dispute about neutrality, factual accuracy, tone, etc. 11:01, 21 October 2005 (UTC) PS It could need Admin attention: there are article ownership and civility issues too. 11:31, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Dhul-Qarnayn - Extremely controversial topic relating to a wide variety of Islamic and non-Islamic literature. Large group of apologetic POV pushers are making unexplained edits, deleting vast amounts of content and refusing to explain their edits. A certain user started a version fork of the article on her User pages and certain apologists have taken this opportunity to start a revert war dedicated to replacing the article with the version fork, without adequate discussion. Mediation, comments, or participation in editing is strongly requested. 01:35, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Pop music issues. Issues involving article formatting, content, policy volations in article content, notability, and more. -- 5:18, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Snoop Dogg. Was this person born in 1971 or 1972? There are some sources not consistant with eachother. -- 02:46, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Bible. What versions and/or translation resources should be linked? Should commercial sites that provide study tools be linked to if parrallel non-commercial sources exist? 00:21, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Time Out (album). A disagreement concerning the use of a horizontal line to divide a disambiguation message from the article. One editor has seen it used on other articles, and has added it to this one; another editor has never seen it, holds it to be abnormal, and insists on deleting it. It's a minor issue, but could affect many other articles. 20:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Serenity (film) — We have an edit war with frequent reversions in which the box office results of the film are being alternately cast in a favorable and unfavorable light. Some attempts have been made to swing this toward a more neutral stance. At least one of the participants has not responded to multiple attempts to get explanations for their view of the edits. We could use some outside help here. Thanks. ~ 07:48, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Left Behind III- I'm wondering if there is a copyvio in here somewhere. --17:49, 8 October 2005 (UTC)~
- Talk:The Andy Griffith Show - Users keep deleting POV that the program presents "questionable morals" as well as other sections. Do not seem to realize that NPOV involves presenting many POVs 16:44, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:King of All Cosmos - Should this be merged into Katamari Damacy? (Sort of a two-man-band, but other editors have expressed opinions, opening the debate up a little.) 02:34, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Because of You (Kelly Clarkson song) — two issues, both with implications for other articles of the same sort. First, should this short article be divided into sections? Secondly, should the table of chart-details be divided into two or more tables? 16:36, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Nash the Slash - Does the subject of an article (or the president of his fan club) have the right to insist that Wikipedia cannot give his real name, if his real name is already publicly available on other websites? Nobody's claiming that the information is wrong; the claim is that the artist doesn't want it publicized (even though it already has been elsewhere). --17:24, 3 October 2005
- Talk:System of a Down - is this band really nu metal or just metal? Have they ever really been nu metal? We've also had various past problems and disputes during a year with the article whether the 2005 double albums Hypnotize was supposed to be first and Mezmerize was supposed to be last or not. If so, does all of this count? -- 19:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Brechtian theatre - should this stub, as well as alienation effect and Verfremdungseffekt, be merged into epic theater? 17:38, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Copperhead Road - user adding link to proprietary format audio. 18:13, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Steve Winwood - user repeatedly adding link to his own website; audio links and deprecated HTML. 07:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Blind Faith - user repeatedly adding modern- day picture of Steve Winwood, audio links and deprecated HTML. 07:01, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:John Byrne - Jimbo has requested we rigorously fact and POV check this article and we'd like some assistance. Thanks. 16:33, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Elvis Presley - long-running dispute over the inclusion of rumours. 08:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Traditional music - originally an article, then redirected to folk music, then an article again following a VfD debate over trad
- Talk:The_Black_Dahlia_Murder Dispute regarding music genre. An anonymous user continues to revert the article to his/her partial version and mostly refuses to participate in discussion in making the article neutral. (See the entry titled "Impasse") 04:12, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Annie Hall - dispute over arguably unencyclopedic addition. 02:06, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman (Pakistan media magnate) - edit war about inclusion of critical material. Needs admin attention: escalating dispute, personal attacks, legal threats, sock puppets. etc. 12:34, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Travis Meeks - hard to tell what is factual and what is parody here. 19:41, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Magic: The Gathering - cut from RFMediation. Uncle Ed 18:36, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Rhythm and blues: dispute over the relative prominence afforded to certain musicians and over proper sub-genres and fact-checking information included to article. 01:49, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Jodie_Foster -Multiple reverts deleting facts on Foster's ad work part of her career 17:12, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
- Lance Armstrong - should the doping allegations be mentioned and to which extent? 14:19, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Bill Oddie - A revert war over whether Bill Oddie, Nigel Mansell and Ashia Hansen should be in the Natives of Birmingham category. 15:44, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Katharine Hepburn - Disputes over factual matters relating to the life of Katharine Hepburn.
- Talk:Encyclopædia Dramatica - Disputes over whether an article that was VFDed multiple times and came back under a slightly different name (one the site actually does not use) is too long, too promotional, and whether information abotu the site's owner should be included. Most people currently editing are fans of the site and not necessarily here to make good encyclopedia entries. 15:56, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Wikimedia - Poll and survey on whether the article is biased and a criticism section should be added in it, and whether a sysop was right in using his revert power to remove criticism made by a MediaWiki developer. Wikinerd 03:36, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Krelian — disagreement over inclusion of comparisons to Evangelion and personality section. 02:44, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Princess Peach Toadstool — should this page be at Princess Peach, Princess Toadstool, or Princess Peach Toadstool?
- Talk:Take_Five#RFC:Image_choice — dispute over which musical transcription image should be used 00:08, 2005 August 12 (UTC)
- Talk:Rukario and Talk:Lucario - Which is this Pokémon's Romaji name? 13:33, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Metroid: Zero Mission - is there enough evidence to state this video game as a re-telling/remake or a prequel of Metroid? 05:47, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Harry Potter — one editor insists on going against consensus and deleting the "Slavery" subsection of "Themes", saying that it is not a major theme and should not be listed. 15:43, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Low (song) — a couple of editors insist on dividing a short article into a one-sentence summary and three very short sections. 14:11, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Metroid: Zero Mission - Dispute that has lasted almost a month, regarding whether the video game is a prequel or re-telling of a previous game in the series, Metroid. 00:18, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Talk:Rob Liefeld - dispute about how to characterize the current popularity of Liefeld in the introduction to the article 21:34, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
- Category talk:Star Wars films - Should thie category be reserved for only the Star Wars Episodes (the feature films which were released theatrically), or should it include other films released by LucasFilm (e.g., The Star Wars Holiday Special), or should the definition be made even broader to cover notable fan films and/or films that influenced the six Episodes? BrianSmithson 12:09, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
- Nichelle Nichols - dispute over whether or not comments about clothing and the portrayal of women on Star Trek are relevant and/or POV. 21:11, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
Also helps finding: RequestsforcommentMediaartandliterature, Requestsfor, forcomment, commentMedia, Mediaart, artand, andliterature, medio, arg, literatura, medias, att, literatur, medi, arr |
| |
|
 |
|
 |