Institutional review board - All About All

Search:  

Everything you wanted to know - online encyclopedia

See live article   •   Institutional review board
 

Institutional review board

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Institutional Review Board. (Discuss)


Institutional review board/independent ethics committee (IRB/IEC) is an appropriately constituted group that has been formally designated to review and monitor biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects. In accordance with FDA and HHS regulations, an IRB has the authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove research. This group review serves an important role in the protection of the rights and welfare of human research subjects.

The purpose of IRB review is to assure, both in advance and by periodic review, that appropriate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of humans participating as subjects in the research. To accomplish this purpose, IRBs use a group process to review research protocols and related materials (e.g., informed consent documents and investigator brochures) to ensure protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects of research.

"IRB" is a generic term used by FDA (and the department of Health and Human Services (HHS)) to refer to a group whose function is to review research to assure the protection of the rights and welfare of the human subjects. Each institution may use whatever name it chooses. Regardless of the name chosen, the IRB is subject to the Agency's IRB regulations when studies of FDA regulated products are reviewed and approved.


Responsibilities

According to ICH GCP an IRB/IEC should safeguard the rights, safety, and well-being of all trial subjects. Special attention should be paid to trials that may include vulnerable subjects.

The IRB/IEC should obtain the following documents:

trial protocol(s)/amendment(s), written informed consent form(s) and consent form updates that the investigator proposes for use in the trial, subject recruitment procedures (e.g., advertisements), written information to be provided to subjects, Investigator's Brochure (IB), available safety information, information about payments and compensation available to subjects, the investigator's current curriculum vitae and/or other documentation evidencing qualifications, and any other documents that the IRB/IEC may need to fulfill its responsibilities.

The IRB/IEC should review a proposed clinical trial within a reasonable time and document its views in writing, clearly identifying the trial, the documents reviewed and the dates for the following:

approval/favourable opinion; modifications required prior to its approval/favourable opinion; disapproval/negative opinion; and termination/suspension of any prior approval/favourable opinion. According to ICH GCP the IRB/IEC should consider the qualifications of the investigator for the proposed trial, as documented by a current curriculum vitae and/or by any other relevant documentation the IRB/IEC requests.

According to ICH GCP the IRB/IEC should conduct continuing review of each ongoing trial at intervals appropriate to the degree of risk to human subjects, but at least once per year.

The IRB/IEC may request more information than is outlined in paragraph 4.8.10 be given to subjects when, in the judgment of the IRB/IEC, the additional information would add meaningfully to the protection of the rights, safety and/or well-being of the subjects. When a non-therapeutic trial is to be carried out with the consent of the subject's legally acceptable representative (see 4.8.12, 4.8.14), the IRB/IEC should determine that the proposed protocol and/or other document(s) adequately addresses relevant ethical concerns and meets applicable regulatory requirements for such trials. Where the protocol indicates that prior consent of the trial subject or the subject's legally acceptable representative is not possible (see 4.8.15), the IRB/IEC should determine that the proposed protocol and/or other document(s) adequately addresses relevant ethical concerns and meets applicable regulatory requirements for such trials (i.e., in emergency situations). The IRB/IEC should review both the amount and method of payment to subjects to assure that neither presents problems of coercion or undue influence on the trial subjects. Payments to a subject should be prorated and not wholly contingent on completion of the trial by the subject.

According to ICH GCP(good clinical practice) the IRB/IEC should ensure that information regarding payment to subjects, including the methods, amounts, and schedule of payment to trial subjects, is set forth in the written informed consent form and any other written information to be provided to subjects. The way payment will be prorated should be specified.


External links

This article incorporates text from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which is in the public domain.


Also helps finding: Institutionalreviewboard, Institutionalreview, reviewboard, insitutional, reveiw, bord, instituional, revie, boared, instituational, reviewd, boerd, instiutional, eview, boars

   
 
  
Add to bookmarks
Related Articles
 
List of AIDS-related topics
Top Articles
 
2000
2005
Brazil
California
Census
County seat
Denmark
England
Germany
Mexico
New York
Pacific Islander (U.S. Census)
Paris
Population density
Record label
Russia
Scotland
Square mile
Television
The Beatles
Work of the United States Government
Search LiveJournal blogs for Institutional review board
 

Find jobs  •  Credit Consolidation  •  Myspace Layouts  •  Credit Consolidation •  Floor Lamps

Copyright @ 2005 AllAboutAll.Info
This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.